| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MaBi
Site Admin
Joined: Jan 01, 2006
Posts: 993
Location: Italy
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AzrgExplorers
Joined: May 17, 2017
Posts: 41
Location: Calgary, Canada
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2017 4:23 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Thanks, I saw that thread after I made the post. Sorry to bother you about it again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaBi
Site Admin
Joined: Jan 01, 2006
Posts: 993
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2017 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No problem at all, thanks to you for taking the time to report the bug.
And it is fixed now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AzrgExplorers
Joined: May 17, 2017
Posts: 41
Location: Calgary, Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 10:06 pm Post subject: MIT effect not logged |
|
|
| When the "MIT" wonder grants the ability to deploy a worker for free on a new building, there is no mention of MIT in the log (e.g. "MIT effect:"). See for example Game #65785. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AzrgExplorers
Joined: May 17, 2017
Posts: 41
Location: Calgary, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 6:38 am Post subject: Potala Palace scoring not logged |
|
|
| In game 65949 (recently finished), I seem to have received my points for Potala Palace at the end of the last round, but I don't see this anywhere in the log. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaBi
Site Admin
Joined: Jan 01, 2006
Posts: 993
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 9:24 am Post subject: Re: MIT effect not logged |
|
|
| AzrgExplorers wrote: | | When the "MIT" wonder grants the ability to deploy a worker for free on a new building, there is no mention of MIT in the log (e.g. "MIT effect:"). See for example Game #65785. |
Right, this is fixed now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaBi
Site Admin
Joined: Jan 01, 2006
Posts: 993
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 9:30 am Post subject: Re: Potala Palace scoring not logged |
|
|
| AzrgExplorers wrote: | | In game 65949 (recently finished), I seem to have received my points for Potala Palace at the end of the last round, but I don't see this anywhere in the log. |
Not sure about this, card scoring is never logged anywhere, it is always taken into account and continuously updated during the game in the scoring mouse-over. Should it be logged at the end of the game? In this case there should be a sort of summary scoring table where everything is displayed, not just cards scoring effects. I don't know but I doubt I will add this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AzrgExplorers
Joined: May 17, 2017
Posts: 41
Location: Calgary, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just the way the card is worded ("+1 (VP) per advisor"), I was expecting to receive victory point chips during scoring, rather than just having it counted towards card scoring. The wording is similar to cards like Carolus Linnaeus ("Buy Golden Age: Gain (VP): +1 (VP)"), which do give you victory point chips.
I checked the log for this because I wanted to confirm that it gave me two points because I had two advisors due to Zhu Xi. Being a programmer myself I'm always on the lookout for the corner cases that might break a program ;) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaBi
Site Admin
Joined: Jan 01, 2006
Posts: 993
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AzrgExplorers wrote: | | Just the way the card is worded ("+1 (VP) per advisor"), I was expecting to receive victory point chips during scoring, rather than just having it counted towards card scoring. The wording is similar to cards like Carolus Linnaeus ("Buy Golden Age: Gain (VP): +1 (VP)"), which do give you victory point chips. |
Yes, those are different: a card like Linnaeus is an effect happening at a precise moment (when you buy a Golden Age) and gives you VP chips, and so it is logged. Potala Palace doesn't give you VP chips, it's an end of game scoring, no different than the VPs you get from workers on buildings and military, and those are not logged. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AzrgExplorers
Joined: May 17, 2017
Posts: 41
Location: Calgary, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fair enough! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Talaborn
Joined: Jun 14, 2017
Posts: 15
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2017 3:37 pm Post subject: Salem Witch Trials |
|
|
In game 66103 Japan was last in stability. Event was Salem Witch trials. Japan didnt lose the Emperor (for sure). But didnt lose 3 gold instead. Did I miss a rule or is it a bug?
Greetings
Talaborn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaBi
Site Admin
Joined: Jan 01, 2006
Posts: 993
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:13 pm Post subject: Re: Salem Witch Trials |
|
|
| Talaborn wrote: | | In game 66103 Japan was last in stability. Event was Salem Witch trials. Japan didnt lose the Emperor (for sure). But didnt lose 3 gold instead. Did I miss a rule or is it a bug? |
It looks like a bug to me: the Emperor can never be removed, so I think that in this cases Japan should be treated as having no advisor.
I will fix this, thank you for reporting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AzrgExplorers
Joined: May 17, 2017
Posts: 41
Location: Calgary, Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 1:42 am Post subject: Hajj from Mali |
|
|
| When the Hajj from Mali event is applied, and one of the players affected has 2 gold or less, that player isn't mentioned in the log (even to say "not enough gold, no loss"). This can be confusing; see for example game #66044. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaBi
Site Admin
Joined: Jan 01, 2006
Posts: 993
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 8:58 am Post subject: Re: Hajj from Mali |
|
|
| AzrgExplorers wrote: | | When the Hajj from Mali event is applied, and one of the players affected has 2 gold or less, that player isn't mentioned in the log (even to say "not enough gold, no loss"). This can be confusing; see for example game #66044. |
Fixed, thanks for reporting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaBi
Site Admin
Joined: Jan 01, 2006
Posts: 993
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 1:05 pm Post subject: Re: Salem Witch Trials |
|
|
| Talaborn wrote: | | In game 66103 Japan was last in stability. Event was Salem Witch trials. Japan didnt lose the Emperor (for sure). But didnt lose 3 gold instead. Did I miss a rule or is it a bug? |
This is now fixed: Japan player can't lose the Emperor so he will always lose 3 Gold in this Event. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
