View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
astroglide

Joined: Apr 20, 2006 Posts: 80
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:35 pm Post subject: trier privelege: does it count for card colors? |
|
|
i just used the trier privelege to take an "invisible" move action, but it didn't add use of a blue card. i'm not sure if it's supposed to or not. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mrbass

Joined: Apr 18, 2006 Posts: 35 Location: Las Vegas
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Did you have sufficient funds as you still need to pay for the action card. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MaBi Site Admin

Joined: Jan 01, 2006 Posts: 1007 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do not dare to start another rule argument! :).
I'm sure I have read somewhere that you take the action but not the card. Otherwise you should take away the card from an opponent because in the real game you can't generate cards at will like here (I have played a game with 4 cities and 8 aristocrats of the same color :)). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mrbass

Joined: Apr 18, 2006 Posts: 35 Location: Las Vegas
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Archidiocese of Trier
The player may, in phase IV, use an action card that is normally used in phase IV, but is no longer available. He takes the action as though the card was available to take, including paying for it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sedjtroll

Joined: Mar 06, 2006 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:52 pm Post subject: Sounds like it counts |
|
|
"Take the action as if the card were there to take"
Doesn'tt hat sound like you'd take the card, as if it were there to take, you'd take it..? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nyarly

Joined: Oct 10, 2006 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IIRC there's an explicit reference that the Trier privilege doesn't impact your descendants. In other words, you take the action but not the card. The MaBi web implementation is in line with that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|