Username:
Password:
Create an account
Home
·
Game Manager
·
Forums
·
Your Account
Login
Username
Password
Don't have an account yet? You can
create one
.
Site Sections
·
Home
·
Game Manager
·
Forums
·
Private Messages
·
Your Account
Game Manager
·
Your games
·
Waiting games
·
Create new game
·
Running games
·
Richelieu
·
ShadowEmperor
·
Gods
·
Kreta
·
Ur
·
Mykerinos
·
YearDragon
·
Nations
·
Completed games
Recent News
MaBiWeb: Forums
MaBiWeb :: Post a reply
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
MaBiWeb Forum Index
->
Nations
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Logitude"]Here's some data from the previous BGG tournament: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WG5yJZODzcl8gf0oPl5Ijw0kkQvI_qcD2GSvK_PoD8o/edit#gid=1760889923 Some things to keep in mind are that these are all 4-player games, and there's one rule change, which is that Korea's starting ability only grants it one architect per golden age, not two. I mostly agree with what the stats show. Persia is very strong. Korea without the nerf is also very strong. Mali and America are quite weak. The one I disagree with most is Poland. I think it's stronger than its showing in the tournament would suggest. I'm not the greatest player or anything though, and still fairly new to the game.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
OFF
Disable BBCode in this post
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Jump to:
Select a forum
MaBiWeb
----------------
News
General
Bug reports
Italian forum
Games released
----------------
Nations
In the Year of the Dragon
Mykerinos
Ur
Kreta
Gods
In the Shadow of the Emperor
Samurai
Richelieu
Hansa
Topic review
Author
Message
Logitude
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 4:18 am
Post subject:
Logitude wrote:
I mostly agree with what the stats show. Persia is very strong. Korea without the nerf is also very strong. Mali and America are quite weak. The one I disagree with most is Poland. I think it's stronger than its showing in the tournament would suggest. I'm not the greatest player or anything though, and still fairly new to the game.
I've been keeping stats of tournment matches since this. I recently updated my stats and ran my analysis script again, and I remembered back to when I posted this.
As good as Poland maybe seems like it should be, it's empirically bottom of the barrel. Like worse than Mali and Arabs bad. At least for 4 player, which is what all my stats are for.
And I don't think Persia is particularly strong in 4 player either. I think it's actually a relatively overrated nation at 4. I think it is quite strong at 3 though because there's more turmoil/player each round. And America can be pretty decent.
Here's a BGG post where I link to my GitHub repo with the analysis scripts and logs:
https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/2966028/article/41113061#41113061
In my experience now though, while nation selection can have a big influence, the player is the biggest factor, even among regular tournament players at or near the top tier. I think that's a testament to the game design. It's far from perfectly balanced, but it's good enough.
Mwak
Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2020 8:14 pm
Post subject:
LordChambers wrote:
Logitude wrote:
LordChambers, will you explain the tables on the right of the Season 3 stats sheet? What do the 3’s and 4’s mean under Sun Tzu and Sphinx?
No, because I don't understand myself. This is the work of siegfried_cf. He can elaborate.
I believe it works as follows.
With this table :
https://i.imgur.com/ETFqVmy.png
It means that in Main and Open Divisions combined, 5 people who finished the game 2nd picked Sun Tzu.
Among these players, two were the first to go on first round (we can assume they picked Sun Tzu first thing), one was second to go on the first round, and two were 3rd to go.
I am surprised noone who picked Sun Tzu won the game during S3.
Sten wrote:
Can you explain the spreadsheet? Is it saying that no one who took SunTsu came first, and if you took the Sphinx, you only won if you were the third or fourth player?
Noone who took Sun Tzu came first indeed. But your logic for the Sphinx is backwards. It's not that the Sphinx is somehow better for 3rd or 4th player, but that picking it first thing as if it was a top priority wonder may actually hurt someone, especially with a more aggro board.
LordChambers
Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:00 am
Post subject:
Logitude wrote:
LordChambers, will you explain the tables on the right of the Season 3 stats sheet? What do the 3’s and 4’s mean under Sun Tzu and Sphinx?
No, because I don't understand myself. This is the work of siegfried_cf. He can elaborate.
Logitude
Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:44 pm
Post subject:
LordChambers, will you explain the tables on the right of the Season 3 stats sheet? What do the 3’s and 4’s mean under Sun Tzu and Sphinx?
My guess is that “4†means 4th choice of nation, thus first to act during the action phase, not 4th in initial turn order. Just a guess though.
This season, in one of the matches where I had last choice of nation, I took Sphinx with my first action and won with an 8-point lead, I think in large part because Sphinx:
http://www.mabiweb.com/modules.php?name=GM_Nations&g_id=79964&op=view_game_reset
Sten
Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:05 pm
Post subject:
[quote="Logitude"]Here's some data from the previous BGG tournament:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WG5yJZODzcl8gf0oPl5Ijw0kkQvI_qcD2GSvK_PoD8o/edit#gid=1760889923
Can you explain the spreadsheet? Is it saying that no one who took SunTsu came first, and if you took the Sphinx, you only won if you were the third or fourth player?
Riku
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 10:10 pm
Post subject:
America is far more powerful in 5er than in 4er, because Democratic Republicans hit in basic situation 2 persons (so the action is twice as good), there is more dynasties to affect (I mean more players means more opportunities) and books give more points. Just to say that player count and difficulty level affect quite much to nations powers.
Logitude
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 6:44 pm
Post subject:
Here's some data from the previous BGG tournament:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WG5yJZODzcl8gf0oPl5Ijw0kkQvI_qcD2GSvK_PoD8o/edit#gid=1760889923
Some things to keep in mind are that these are all 4-player games, and there's one rule change, which is that Korea's starting ability only grants it one architect per golden age, not two.
I mostly agree with what the stats show. Persia is very strong. Korea without the nerf is also very strong. Mali and America are quite weak. The one I disagree with most is Poland. I think it's stronger than its showing in the tournament would suggest. I'm not the greatest player or anything though, and still fairly new to the game.
Riku
Posted: Sun May 10, 2020 10:16 pm
Post subject:
I play mostly 5ers. Here is my strong and weak nations in vacuum:
Strong:
1. Rome
2. China
3. America
4. Greece
5. Persia
Weak:
1. Mali
2. Arabs
3. Portugal
4. Vikings
5. Ethiopia
Narcissus1
Posted: Sun May 10, 2020 3:22 pm
Post subject: Best nations to choose including dynasties
What do you guys are the best nations to choose?
Of course the board matters, but let us just discuss the nations on their own.
My top 5 is:
1. Rome
2. Japan
3. Persia
4. Mongolia
5. Egypt
Bottom 5:
1. Portugal
2. Greece
3. Vikings
4. China
5. Poland
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Forums ©
MaBiWeb copyright © 2006 by MaBi
PHP-Nuke
Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi.
Page Generation: 0.03 Seconds